Fund Guide

A working map of the TLFFRA fund landscape.

Latest reported Texas Pension Review Board (PRB) data, plan-by-plan expense ratios, and public-source vendor research for board members, administrators, and sponsor partners preparing for Peer Review.

Plans 42 TLFFRA systems in the directory
Combined AUM $3.3B Latest reported PRB net total assets
AUM-weighted FR 72.3% Funded ratio weighted by plan assets
Median Expense 65.0 bps PRB total expenses as a percentage of assets
Provider Leads 10 Funds with public vendor detail captured
Peer Review quick scan

Leaderboards

These are sorting aids, not judgments. Each plan has its own funding policy, benefit history, payroll base, and local governance context.

AUM

Largest Funds

  1. 1Irving FF$306.9M
  2. 2Lubbock FF$300.8M
  3. 3Laredo FF$278.7M
  4. 4Amarillo FF$266.7M
  5. 5Corpus Christi FF$218.4M
Funded ratio

Highest Funded

  1. 1The Woodlands FF105.2%
  2. 2Paris FF105.1%
  3. 3Denton FF91.2%
  4. 4Amarillo FF90.4%
  5. 5Weslaco FF89.5%
Years

Shortest Amortization

  1. 1The Woodlands FF0.0 yr
  2. 2Paris FF0.0 yr
  3. 3Weslaco FF6.4 yr
  4. 4Denton FF6.5 yr
  5. 5Waxahachie FF10.9 yr
Total expense bps

Lowest Expenses

  1. 1Lubbock FF12.8 bps
  2. 2Laredo FF22.4 bps
  3. 3Irving FF25.4 bps
  4. 4San Angelo FF28.0 bps
  5. 5Temple FF31.1 bps
Directory

All 42 funds

Search, filter, and sort. Fund names open local profile pages with PRB links, source notes, and verified provider detail.

42 funds visible

Swipe table for more columns

Checked October 3, 2026. Financial FY 2024–2025; actuarial valuations FY 2023–2026; contribution rates FY 2025–2026; membership FY 2024–2025. Each profile shows its periods. AUM labels use PRB net total assets; weighted FR is the asset-weighted mean of reported ratios. Color bands are display ranges, not PRB ratings. Expense bps means PRB total expenses as a percentage of assets, converted to basis points. PRB cautions that investment-expense reporting is not fully consistent across systems, so this column should be read as a comparative public filing metric.

Fund official updates

Request an update review.

Board members and fund administrators can request review of the newest advisor, administrator, actuary, auditor, custodian, manager, and fee information. Use an official fund or city email where possible; Simpli-FI Events verifies the requester's role before following up by email with next steps, and nothing is published without review.

Contact information and notes submitted here are used to verify credentials and route the update review. They do not change the public guide automatically.

Research standard

Provider names are included only when located in public PRB, fund, city, audit, actuarial valuation, or board-minute sources. Missing provider fields mean a public source was not located during this pass, not that the fund lacks that provider.

PRB plan data and expense ratios are sourced from the Texas Pension Review Board data center. Expense bps is the PRB reported total expenses as a percentage of assets, multiplied by 10,000. Expense rank is sorted by reported bps from lowest to highest, so rank 42 of 42 is the highest reported expense bps in this TLFFRA comparison set.

Provider details are sourced from fund-published audits, actuarial valuations, board minutes, PRB documents, or city/fund websites. If a provider field is blank, it means a named public source was not located during this pass.

This guide is an informational public-filing comparison only. It is not investment, actuarial, legal, fiduciary, procurement, or provider-selection advice, and it does not endorse any fund or vendor.

PRB data center PRB plan example PRB expense CSV pattern