Plans 42 TLFFRA systems in the directory
Combined AUM $3.0B FY2024 market value of assets
AUM-weighted FR 72.1% Funded ratio weighted by plan assets
Median Expense 66.3 bps PRB total expenses as a percentage of assets
Provider Leads 10 Funds with public vendor detail captured
Peer Review quick scan

Leaderboards

These are sorting aids, not judgments. Each plan has its own funding policy, benefit history, payroll base, and local governance context.

AUM

Largest Funds

  1. 1 Irving FF $279.1M
  2. 2 Lubbock FF $277.8M
  3. 3 Amarillo FF $254.3M
  4. 4 Laredo FF $247.9M
  5. 5 Corpus Christi FF $194.7M
Funded ratio

Highest Funded

  1. 1 Paris FF 105.1%
  2. 2 The Woodlands FF 103.8%
  3. 3 Amarillo FF 95.2%
  4. 4 Denton FF 91.1%
  5. 5 Weslaco FF 89.5%
Years

Shortest Amortization

  1. 1 Amarillo FF 5.9 yr
  2. 2 Weslaco FF 6.4 yr
  3. 3 Denton FF 6.5 yr
  4. 4 Waxahachie FF 10.9 yr
  5. 5 Corpus Christi FF 14.7 yr
Total expense bps

Lowest Expenses

  1. 1 Lubbock FF 14.0 bps
  2. 2 Laredo FF 25.6 bps
  3. 3 Temple FF 27.1 bps
  4. 4 Irving FF 28.0 bps
  5. 5 San Angelo FF 28.0 bps
Directory

All 42 funds

Search, filter, and sort. Fund names open local profile pages with PRB links, source notes, and verified provider detail.

42 funds visible

Swipe table for more columns

Expense bps means PRB total expenses as a percentage of assets, converted to basis points. PRB cautions that investment-expense reporting is not fully consistent across systems, so this column should be read as a comparative public filing metric.

Fund official updates

Request an update review.

Board members and fund administrators can request review of the newest advisor, administrator, actuary, auditor, custodian, manager, and fee information. Use an official fund or city email where possible; Simpli-FI Events verifies the requester's role before following up by email with next steps, and nothing is published without review.

Contact information and notes submitted here are used to verify credentials and route the update review. They do not change the public guide automatically.

Research standard

Provider names are included only when located in public PRB, fund, city, audit, actuarial valuation, or board-minute sources. Missing provider fields mean a public source was not located during this pass, not that the fund lacks that provider.

PRB plan data and expense ratios are sourced from the Texas Pension Review Board data center. Expense bps is the PRB reported total expenses as a percentage of assets, multiplied by 10,000. Expense rank is sorted by reported bps from lowest to highest, so rank 42 of 42 is the highest reported expense bps in this TLFFRA comparison set.

Provider details are sourced from fund-published audits, actuarial valuations, board minutes, PRB documents, or city/fund websites. If a provider field is blank, it means a named public source was not located during this pass.

This guide is an informational public-filing comparison only. It is not investment, actuarial, legal, fiduciary, procurement, or provider-selection advice, and it does not endorse any fund or vendor.