Leaderboards
These are sorting aids, not judgments. Each plan has its own funding policy, benefit history, payroll base, and local governance context.
Largest Funds
- 1 Irving FF $279.1M
- 2 Lubbock FF $277.8M
- 3 Amarillo FF $254.3M
- 4 Laredo FF $247.9M
- 5 Corpus Christi FF $194.7M
Highest Funded
- 1 Paris FF 105.1%
- 2 The Woodlands FF 103.8%
- 3 Amarillo FF 95.2%
- 4 Denton FF 91.1%
- 5 Weslaco FF 89.5%
Shortest Amortization
- 1 Amarillo FF 5.9 yr
- 2 Weslaco FF 6.4 yr
- 3 Denton FF 6.5 yr
- 4 Waxahachie FF 10.9 yr
- 5 Corpus Christi FF 14.7 yr
Lowest Expenses
- 1 Lubbock FF 14.0 bps
- 2 Laredo FF 25.6 bps
- 3 Temple FF 27.1 bps
- 4 Irving FF 28.0 bps
- 5 San Angelo FF 28.0 bps
All 42 funds
Search, filter, and sort. Fund names open local profile pages with PRB links, source notes, and verified provider detail.
Swipe table for more columns
Expense bps means PRB total expenses as a percentage of assets, converted to basis points. PRB cautions that investment-expense reporting is not fully consistent across systems, so this column should be read as a comparative public filing metric.
Request an update review.
Board members and fund administrators can request review of the newest advisor, administrator, actuary, auditor, custodian, manager, and fee information. Use an official fund or city email where possible; Simpli-FI Events verifies the requester's role before following up by email with next steps, and nothing is published without review.
Provider names are included only when located in public PRB, fund, city, audit, actuarial valuation, or board-minute sources. Missing provider fields mean a public source was not located during this pass, not that the fund lacks that provider.
PRB plan data and expense ratios are sourced from the Texas Pension Review Board data center. Expense bps is the PRB reported total expenses as a percentage of assets, multiplied by 10,000. Expense rank is sorted by reported bps from lowest to highest, so rank 42 of 42 is the highest reported expense bps in this TLFFRA comparison set.
Provider details are sourced from fund-published audits, actuarial valuations, board minutes, PRB documents, or city/fund websites. If a provider field is blank, it means a named public source was not located during this pass.
This guide is an informational public-filing comparison only. It is not investment, actuarial, legal, fiduciary, procurement, or provider-selection advice, and it does not endorse any fund or vendor.